Biden Vaccine Mandate Challenges Moved to Appeals Court in Ohio

WASHINGTON — A federal judicial panel on Tuesday tasked the Cincinnati Court of Appeals to hear at least 34 lawsuits filed across the country challenging the Biden administration’s attempt to require major employers to require their workers to be vaccinated against the coronavirus or submit them weekly. tests.

A court clerk for the U.S. Judicial Committee on Multi-District Litigation randomly selected the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit by drawing from a cylinder containing entries for the twelve regional courts of appeals, each with at least one related case pending. The procedure can be used to combine cases that all raise the same problem.

While simplifying the legal dispute, this move also had the effect of removing the order from the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans. This month, a three-judge panel blocked the government from moving forward with the rule — declaring it “grossly exceeds” the authority of the occupational safety agency that issued it.

All three judges on that panel are conservatives, including two appointed by former President Donald J. Trump. It was not immediately clear which judges in the Sixth Circuit would be tasked with looking into the matter, nor whether they would decide to proceed with an injunction against the mandate or instead allow the government to move forward for now amid the memos and arguments.

The Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration released the “emergency” standard this month. Under this rule, companies with at least 100 employees must require unvaccinated workers to wear masks indoors from December 5.

The rule excludes employees who do not come into close contact with other people in their jobs – such as those who work exclusively at home or outdoors.

President Biden instructed the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to develop the rule in September, when he also announced mandates for other vaccines that rely on various legal powers. These include mandates for federal civilian employees, federal troops, and employees of federal contractors.

A variety of plaintiffs—including many large employers and several Republican-controlled states—have filed lawsuits against the employer’s mandate, arguing that it was illegal overreach.

Cases generally argue that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has no legitimate authority to issue regulations that protect workers from exposure to disease, unlike workplace hazards such as asbestos, and that framing the mandate as a workplace safety effort was an excuse for the Biden administration’s true motive: pressure on Americans who were reluctant to get vaccinated.

In a previous lawsuit before the Fifth Circuit, the Department of Justice argued that the rule is necessary to protect workers from the pandemic and is well-established in law.

The Biden administration said in one of those filings that blocking the mandate “is likely to cost tens or even hundreds of lives per day, in addition to large numbers of hospitalizations, other serious health implications, and colossal costs.” “This is a confluence of first-degree damage.”

However, the Fifth Circuit Committee sided with the plaintiffs, writing that in enacting the law that created the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and enabled it to issue “emergency” rules to protect workplace safety, Congress did not intend “to authorize the Workplace Safety Administration in deep recesses.” “The federal bureaucracy to make sweeping decisions on matters of public health that affect everyone in society in the most profound ways.”

In general, the sixth circle also tends to be conservative. Of the 16 judges, 5 were appointed by Democrats and 11 were appointed by Republicans. (However, one of the Republican appointees, Justice Helen N. White, was originally a candidate for Democratic President, Bill Clinton, before being re-nominated by the Republican president, George W. Bush, as part of a political deal.)

The circuit also has 10 active “higher ranks” judges, meaning that they are part-timers but sometimes appointed to committees; Of these, two are Democratic appointees and eight are Republican appointees.

No matter what the Sixth Circuit does with the matter, it appears the case is set to make its way to the Supreme Court for a final resolution.

Leave a Comment